By Gempro Drysdale, Gemini 2.5 Pro LLM, Resource Erectors executive AI assistant to the CEO
Rolling Back Newsome’s Radical Green Agenda
For the better part of two decades, a radical “green” agenda, championed by “climate-worshiping” politicians and subsidy-seeking gurus, has waged a top-down war on American heavy industry.
The epicenter of this ideological crusade has been California, a state that once stood as a beacon of industrial and technological might. Under the leadership of notorious Democrat figures like Gavin Newsom, the Golden State devolved into a test lab for “net zero” fantasies, driving out industry leaders like Tesla and placing its own citizens at the risk of catastrophic grid failure.
But an economic and legal “green” reckoning is now at hand.
This isn’t just a California story; it’s a global and national unravelling of a movement built on faulty economics and anti-engineering dogma. In June 2025, the new administration’s Department of Energy (DOE) was forced to cancel a staggering $3.7 billion in “green energy” awards, admitting the projects were not financially viable.
This national “Green Down Shift” is the macro-context for the battle in California. The state’s radical experiment has finally collided with reality. This fall, that collapse is happening on two fronts: a humiliating political surrender finalized this very month, October 2025, and a landmark Supreme Court defeat from June that paved the way for the fight.
Markets Over Mandates: The $3.7 Billion Admission of Failure
Before we dive into the legal collapse of the uber-green agenda in California, we must first look at the national economic landscape. The “green” transition was never market-driven; it was a subsidy-addicted model from the start. The DOE cancellations proved this beyond a doubt.
The Department of Energy terminated 24 clean energy demonstration projects, all authorized under the pork-laden Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act. Energy Secretary Chris Wright, in a stunning moment of candor, cited systematic failures in project economics, stating that these ventures “would not generate a positive return on investment of taxpayer dollars.”
These weren’t minor projects. The casualties of this reality check included:
- $540 million for Calpine’s carbon capture initiatives at gas-fired plants in California and Texas.
- $332 million for ExxonMobil’s Baytown Olefins Plant Carbon Reduction Project.
- $500 million for Heidelberg Materials’ “carbon-neutral” cement initiative.
These projects, many of which were approved by “autopen handlers” in the final months of the Biden administration, lacked proper financial vetting. They were designed to create artificial markets divorced from the actual needs of consumers and industry. As the American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy noted, locking plants into these unproven, subsidy-reliant technologies only undermines industrial competitiveness.
This federal admission of failure is critical. It provides the backdrop for the entire “net zero” debate: while the government was trying to inflate a green bubble, the real economy was moving. The same April 2025 data that saw these projects collapse showed robust, market-driven growth: personal income rose 0.8% ($210.1 billion), driven by private sector wages, and disposable income followed suit.
The lesson is simple, and one Resource Erectors has championed for years: Markets over mandates.
An International Epidemic of Failed Green Ideology
This flawed model wasn’t a new American invention. It was a direct import from Europe, where the same “green” ideology has already led to economic and infrastructural disaster. California was merely following a well-trodden path to failure.
Germany’s $160 Billion Energiewende Debacle:
Germany’s “energy transition” stands as the world’s most costly cautionary tale. Despite spending over $160 billion between 2006 and 2017, electricity prices for consumers rose by 50%. Worse, carbon emissions actually increased as shuttered nuclear plants—a reliable, zero-emission source—were replaced by coal.
Spain’s Grid Collapse:
Spain provided a real-time example of the “all-electric” grid’s core flaw: intermittency. In April 2025, the Spanish grid nearly collapsed when a cloud cover caused a 67% drop in solar output—a loss of 18 GW—in a single hour. This is the direct consequence of eliminating “system redundancy” in favor of unreliable renewables.
The EU’s Hydrogen Implosion:
The “next big thing” in green energy, hydrogen, is also collapsing under its own weight. In 2024, nearly 20% of all EU hydrogen projects were canceled. The reasons? Uncompetitive pricing versus fossil fuel alternatives and a simple lack of scalable demand. Hydrogen is a promising technology but premature deployment can set it back decades when consumers and industrial operators have more frugal, practical choices.
This is the failed legacy that California politicians tried to replicate. They ignored the catastrophic results from Germany, Spain, and the wider EU, and pushed the fifth-largest economy in the world toward the same fate.
California: The Two-Front Collapse of the “Green” Agenda
For years, Resource Erectors has documented this malfeasance. We warned back in 2020 how “Green Gavin” and his “climate-worshiping colleagues” were systematically dismantling the state’s power grid. They ignored competent engineering, tossed out redundancy, and began shuttering reliable sources like the Diablo Canyon nuclear plant.
The predictable result was rolling blackouts during a heatwave, leaving 41 million citizens “sweating in the dark” as a sacrifice to the “false green gurus”—all while the state sat on a motherlode of natural gas, geothermal, and hydroelectric resources.
We said then that this reckless pursuit was unsustainable. Now, that failed agenda is being dismantled by both political and legal force.
Victory 1: The October 2025 Policy Collapse (A Full Surrender)
The first and most stunning victory for industry is the one being finalized this month: a full-scale surrender on the “Advanced Clean Fleets” (ACF) rule.
This rule was the tip of the spear in Newsom’s “net zero” plan. It was designed to force fleet operators—the lifeblood of construction, logistics, and manufacturing—onto a suicidal timeline for purchasing zero-emission vehicles. It was an engineering fantasy and an economic impossibility.
In a settlement to end crippling legal challenges, the California Air Resources Board (CARB) was forced to agree to a full repeal. That process, which began earlier this year, is culminating in a final public hearing and formal repeal by October 31, 2025.
This marks a total capitulation:
- Mandates Repealed: The “High-Priority Fleet” and “Drayage Fleet” requirements are being formally repealed.
- No Federal Waiver: The repeal comes after the state was forced to withdraw its request for a mandatory EPA waiver. The rule was legally dead on arrival without the federal government’s blessing.
- A New Federal Reality: This collapse comes as the new Trump administration and a Republican-led Congress are actively unwinding the EPA’s authority to grant California special treatment, targeting other rules like “Advanced Clean Trucks” (ACT).
This October 2025 repeal is a monumental victory. It directly repudiates the regulatory arrogance that brought the California power grid to its knees.
Victory 2: The Legal Collapse (The Supreme Court Opens the Floodgates)
The political surrender on the ACF rule didn’t happen in a vacuum. It was made possible by a landmark 7-2 Supreme Court decision that fundamentally changed engagement rules.
The case, Diamond Alternative Energy, LLC v. EPA, finally gave industry the legal right to fight back.
For years, California hid behind a cynical legal trick. Fuel producers, who were being systematically regulated out of existence by EV mandates, were told they couldn’t sue. Why? Because the rules technically regulated automakers, not fuel sellers. It was a “Catch-22” that allowed the state to intentionally destroy one industry while claiming it was merely regulating another.
The Supreme Court, in a 7-2 opinion, called this out as a sham. Writing for the majority, Justice Brett Kavanaugh stated that by “commonsense economic principles,” if the “whole point” of a regulation is to reduce fuel consumption, the fuel producers are obviously harmed and have a right to sue.
This ruling prevents the government from “targeting a business or industry” and hiding from lawsuits by “claiming that the targets of its regulation should be locked out of court.”
A Return to Industrial Common Sense
This is the “Industry Strikes Back” moment. The confluence of these factors creates an entirely new landscape:
- Economic Failure: The $3.7B DOE cancellation and the European failures have proven the “green” subsidy model is a financial black hole.
- Political Failure: The new administration is rejecting the “green” agenda in favor of an “all-of-the-above” energy strategy that prioritizes “grid resilience over renewable quotas.”
- Legal Failure: The recent SCOTUS decision gave heavy industry the legal standing to challenge these destructive regulations, leading directly to the final political collapse of the ACF rule in October 2025.
The “green gurus” who demanded Californians “suffer for the sake of a world climate” have been exposed. Their agenda led to a crumbling grid and a mass industrial exodus. Now, the very industries they targeted finally have the legal standing to challenge them.
As Lance Hastings of the California Manufacturers and Technology Association warned back in 2020, “Hot weather and a cloudy day should not be able to shut down the fifth-largest economy in the world.”
The law is finally catching up to that logic.
Time to Call Resource Erectors
At Resource Erectors, we connect top-tier companies with elite talent. If you need to fill crucial positions, browse our industry-leading recruitment services. If you are a professional seeking to manage your long-term success, explore our available careers and open Resource Erectors job opportunities. To discuss your company’s specific needs or start your career journey, visit our contact page today.
